The arrests of the terrorists in England has once again brought home the real danger we all face from fanatical Muslim killers.

The N.Y. Times and Liberals oppose most information gathering techniques used by the Bush administration. Things like phone surveillance by the NSA of suspected overseas calls, and coerced interrogation of captured terror suspects.

The far left wing liberal New York Times editorialized today: "We want to understand as much as possible about what the terrorists were planning. It would be so much better if we could do that by giving every benefit of the doubt to these muslims and protect their Rights ."

Then I read the right wing editorial page at The Wall Street Journal which said this, "The London terror plot was foiled because a large number of people were under surveillance concerning their spending, travel and communications. Which leads us to wonder if Scotland Yard would have succeeded if the ACLU or The New York Times got wind of this operation

This has never really been answerd. Liberals ignore it as if corruption is second nature to them.

Is it because Countrywide’s CEO Angelo R. Mozilo and Fannie Mae’s CEO Franklin Raines are BIG TIME LIBERALS?

Even though those two men have single handedly brought the US Economy to its knees…

What, liberals can do no wrong?

Obama puts Raines on his payroll and accepts a 0% mortgage from Mozilo?

What is the definition of a BRIBE anyway?

Does anyone care?

So far, the only real failures in the economy are:
–banks (and toxic housing loans)
–Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae (home loan owners)
–AIG (insurer of real estate derivitives)

Have you liberals figured out why the bail out bill is being used to pay off democrat political pacs and interest groups?